//
you're reading...
Misc

Editorial: Inventing an independent foreign policy

Editorial :

Inventing an independent Foreign Policy

Rasheed Hasan Khan

More than six decades after the birth of Pakistan, the powers that be, have deemed it expedient to re-formulate the foreign policy of Pakistan. The reasons for this change of heart, albeit belated, is not difficult to see. The foreign policy, which the most allied ally of the U.S. has been zealously pursuing for the last six decades, had driven the country into a blind alley, with no alternatives at its disposal. This did not come as a surprise to the progressive and nationalistic forces in Pakistan. They had, all along been opposed to the ruling class’s penchant for serving Imperialist interests through a foreign policy which was lop sided and did not serve the interests of the Pakistani masses. The dismal story of joining various U.S. sponsored Pacts (S.E.A.T.O. & C.E.N.T.O.), the gratuitous involvement in the cold war on the side of U.S. Imperialism, the disastrous economic and political results of entrapment in the debt-trap of “U.S. Aid” and machinations of international monetary agencies, briefly outlines the journey of Pakistan, from British Colonial domination to the U.S. Imperialist stranglehold. Thus, the country was miserably impoverished; its national fabric destroyed and at the regional and international level, it was totally isolated.

Even so, the ruling classes did not deem it necessary to consider a change in policy. There were some feeble protests off and on but the paradigm and priorities of policy making remained the same. The U.S. policy after 9/11 in 2001 and the notorious “War on Terror” brought a new wave of economic ruin, social dismemberment, death and destruction to Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Government of U.S.A. had browbeaten an already isolated military dictator into jumping onto its military bandwagon. But the true nature of the ‘Pak-U.S. military co-operation’ was soon revealed to the world. The $1.5 Billion a year promised by the U.S. government to Pakistan as ‘aid’ in the ‘War on Terror’ was nothing more than the price paid for the mercenary services of Pakistani military forces! This client and proprietor relationship soon became an endless source of friction and acrimony. The U.S. civil and military personages are on record with their exhortations of ‘DO MORE’ and the taunting invitations to refuse U.S. Aid if the Pakistani side found the conditions unacceptable. The U.S. leadership needs to remember a lesson in realpolitik which they never seem to have retained in their minds. Their adventures in Viet-Nam, Middle East and Africa all proved irrefutably that the comprador element in any third world country may do anything for the imperialist power, except commit suicide as a class. What the American leadership was demanding of the Pakistani ruling classes was nothing short of this. Therefore the ‘alliance’ was doomed and a new framework for mutual relations had to be constructed by the Pakistani ruling classes.

Thus the Parliament was convened to restructure relations with the U.S. and re-invent an independent Foreign Policy. The Parliament has created an all parties committee, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (P.C.N.S.) to discuss and decide on the various issues and options presently available. The recommendations of the committee, appearing in the various media are at this stage only proposals; it may be some time before they are given a concrete shape. However, there is one fact to be kept in mind, in Pakistan the gap between legal dispensation and political reality is often a very large one. As the saying goes, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Let us hope that the future reality in the field of foreign policy is at one with the ideals of an independent sovereign state.

Advertisements

Discussion

7 thoughts on “Editorial: Inventing an independent foreign policy

  1. I find it hard to share that hope. The ‘comprador’ will sell to US, China, Saudi Arabia or any other bidder who offers a price. National Interest of Pakistan is not defined as the well being of 180 million Pakistanis. As a matter of fact, it was clash of interest that the dominant army objected to the Kerry-Lugar aid offer.
    Peace. Respect.
    Rashid

    Posted by Malik Rashid | April 4, 2012, 10:29 pm
  2. Excellent review, as always, on the current political development in Pakistan. As you have rightly concluded, the proof of the pudding is in the eating. Unfortunately, there is little to be hopeful about as there is no organized people friendly political group which can take advantage of the developing contradiction between the imperial powers and the compradors. I hope the new alignment gives political space to the left in Pakistan.

    Posted by Tanveer Imam | April 5, 2012, 7:54 pm
  3. I congratulate the Editor of APNAKAL for writing a short but very comprehensive overview of the current change of foreign policy towards Amercia. As Tanveer and you have rightly said, it is the time to rally and gather freedom and democracy seeking forces.

    Posted by Umar Daraz Khan | April 7, 2012, 4:29 pm
  4. I do not believe that there is any contradiction among all colors of rulers regarding USA and it’s demand.they all will be working in same way with new salary.hoping that people friendly groups will organize them selves is not right because significant people friendly group does not exist and individuals has very little role to play
    Shershah

    Posted by Shershah | April 11, 2012, 9:04 am
    • U.S. rejects the demands made by Pakistani parliamentary committee of halting the drone attacks and folding all covert programs.

      http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/04/13-8

      The Associated Press writes: “Pakistani government is in a more fragile political state, and can no longer continue its earlier practice of quietly allowing the U.S. action while publicly denouncing it, Pakistani officials say”.

      The friction is clearly there. What arrangements the two governments come to is to be seen.

      Posted by Tanveer Imam | April 15, 2012, 6:58 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: