//
you're reading...
Theory

Internal Barriers to the Development of the Left

A comment on the article

Internal Barriers to the Development of the left by Taimur Rehman

Dr.Rasheed Hasan Khan

Self criticism is a vital part of revolutionary culture and this article is an important attempt at an objective examination of his organization’s political practice and its mistakes. While reading the article I could not but remark on the sincerity and honesty of the author, but there are some observations I would like to make which may be helpful in clarifying some points raised in the article. I hope it is taken in the right spirit.

The organization of study circles and the organizational pattern which Taimur Rehman describes was the pattern in USSR, China and Viet-Nam but they succeeded in their revolution and did not become bogged down in ‘small circle mentality’. So it means that the problem lies not in the organizational form but somewhere else. Reading Lenin and Mao on organizational problems, one comes across the categorizations of similar political symptoms as a petite bourgeois phenomenon, related to the class origins of the activists. Their inability to transform themselves in practice into revolutionaries with a working class world view leads to many of the problems that have been pointed out.

Marx never spoke truer words than when he said that “Man’s social being determines his consciousness. “ Every individual’s thinking, behavior and habits bear the stamp of his class. But this is not something immutable. Individuals belonging to bourgeois or petty bourgeois class can transform themselves and their ideas to acquire a working class world view and standpoint; the reverse is also true i.e. someone from the working class may slide into adopting the world view of the exploiting classes. But this transformation is neither quick nor easy. It requires a continuous process of social practice and conscious assimilation of the results of such practice to alter the consciousness of an individual. Revolutionary work, not only in the petite bourgeois class but also in the workers and peasants of a third world country like Pakistan has to confront this challenge above all else. How this challenge is met determines whether the organization grows or withers. If the whole of the left in Pakistan faces such a ‘barrier’, it simply means that the whole of the left has to resolve this issue in practice. It is not the end of the world by any stretch of imagination. The Left organizations must be dynamic political organizations armed with revolutionary theory and deeply involved in social practice and not mere debating forums. There cannot be any other way to solve this problem. No magic formula, no short cuts. The Left has tried many experiments to achieve instant political success but the end result was always the same. It was bound to be, because without correct theoretical frame work, relentless struggle and roots in the masses, it matters very little if there is one organization engaged in the political process or ten.

We must obtain a correct grasp of the relationship between the party, the class and the masses. Only then can we correctly determine the priority and the sequence of our tasks. Lack of political education in the political activists is a very real and serious problem that needs to be addressed on a top priority basis. However, the question of paucity of political literature is more imaginary than real. Has anyone really tried to acquire political literature? I myself have found and purchased scores of books from used book shops and roadside thelas. Amazon.com has books by the ton, you can order and import wholesale if you want. In fact, I think that books that are purchased are more carefully preserved than the free books available in days gone by.

Taimur has pointed out another very pertinent issue, the aversion to ideological struggle. This is another symptom of the same problem, i.e. petite bourgeois liberalism and I mean it in the Marxist sense and not the one in common usage. It is an attitude pertaining to a class and it cannot be altered without active struggle on the political and ideological fronts.

I was rather surprised at the cursory way in which the objective situation of Pakistan and factors external to the movement were treated. It is no fable that Imperialism and the state apparatus of Pakistan have been infiltrating the left movement since the inception of Pakistan. Through their co-opted individuals they have created splits, wrong turns and general confusion at all defining moments in our political life, turning the left’s struggle into the labors of Sisyphus(an individual in Greek mythology, destined perpetually to roll a boulder uphill; when it would reach the summit, it would roll down and the task of Sisyphus would begin anew). Then there is the Frankenstein monster of fundamentalism, which is the reserve force of the exploitative system. Both the above mentioned factors affect on the ground political work.They must be taken into account as features of the political reality which need to be changed.

One can empathize with Taimur’s yearning to see a revolutionary change during his lifetime. But given the stupendous task this entails, we must gird our loins and engage in the struggle regardless of the time needed to achieve victory.

Lastly something to take notice of, a sudden epidemic of criticism of the Left  has broken out in the present time frame, the past, present and future of the left are undergoing a dissection, ostensibly for reasons of scholarly research.  But living in Pakistan, one is bound to feel a little curious, because in Pakistan nothing is in reality what it appears to be.

Advertisements

Discussion

3 thoughts on “Internal Barriers to the Development of the Left

  1. I concur with all that you have said saati Rasheed, nicely written article. I would like to add the following comment: I agree, that self criticism puts our compass in the right direction and on similar terms the organisational political activity subjected to objective and constructive criicism, will help to weed out the wrong in the organisation. A bourgeois organisation needs its propaganda to roll out its plans and objectives overtly or covertly and by spreading lies. A revolutionary organisation has hard task on two fronts: firstly, its objective struggle and its acheivements, and secondly its organisational issues. The objectives have to be based on long term strategy and day to day tactics in simple and clear terms.Organisational integrity is far too difficult to maintain, without proper ideological teachings and practical experience. The evolution from a petite bourgeois to a working class stalwart is far more difficult that understanding theoretical issues. The theory has to be practiced in practical field and by bonding with the working class struggle. Then only our consciousness will change. My zeal for revolutionary struggle was more dynamic during the Landi and S.I.T.E area labour struggle and strike in 1971-72, in Karachi . It also helped me undersatnd Marxism better.

    It is true that the left has had been infiltrated by the agents of capitalist covert organisations. These kind of acts have been seen in Russian, Chinese and Veitnam Revolutions. they were successful because the parties in the respective countries had the practical plateform to launch their struggle. Long march in China was the most effective teaching expedition that helped the petite bourgeois to transform and align with the working class. Likewise was the professional class integretion in the rural working class of China, during cultural revolution. It helped to distinguish the true revolutionary from the ‘faint hearted’ revolutionary or reactionary.

    In Pakistan, the left has suffered from two fronts: one from within and another from without. Organisations will withers from internal rot or flourish from internal healthy infrastructure; Or will be destroyed by external forces directly or indirectly inflicting overt and covert harm.

    The left will rise again, but must take a serious self-critical veiw of its mistakes in the past. Importantly insulate its organisational structure from covert elements infiltrating the party.

    Posted by Abdul Ghafoor Kasi | June 2, 2012, 4:56 am
  2. Thank you very much for posting this and many other articles on this blog. It has been immensely educational. I cannot wait to read your next issue. For readers of the blog, the above article was written in response to Mr. Taimur Rehman’s article, which can be read by using the following link: http://bargad.org/2012/05/22/left-in-pakistan/

    Posted by Tanveer Imam | June 19, 2012, 9:29 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: